The Supreme Court has declared the five-year term claimed by the government to be invalid
What happened
60-second readThe Supreme Court of Somalia ruled that the constitutional term limits for the Federal Parliament, the President, and the Federal Government end in 2026, declaring actions taken after these limits expired as unconstitutional.
What else the report says
- Decision reportedThe court has ordered the political parties to reach an agreement on the electoral process, setting a specific timeframe for holding elections.
- What happens nextThis decision is expected to have a significant impact on the political situation and the debate regarding the legitimacy of Somalia's government institutions.
- The court noted that all actions taken by those institutions after the expiration of their terms were deemed unlawful and unconstitutional.
- This court decision was issued by five judges following a lawsuit filed by former President of Somalia Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed, which was against the Federal Government, particularly regarding the amendments made to the Provisional Constitution of 2012 and the legal implications arising from it.
Reported by BBC Somali
- Why it matters
- The article highlights a significant judicial ruling that could impact the political landscape and governance in Somalia.
- Still unclear
- What specific actions taken by the government are considered unconstitutional?
You are reading the English translation.

More from this report
Original report with a saved translation · Soomaali
Soomaali · Machine translated · Not human reviewed
Reader translation: English
The Supreme Court has declared null and void the five-year term that the government claimed was in effect
The Supreme Court of Somalia has decided that the constitutional term of the Federal Parliament, the President, and the Federal Government would end in the year 2026.
The court noted that all actions taken by those institutions after the expiration of their terms were deemed unlawful and unconstitutional.
This court decision was issued by five judges following a lawsuit filed by former President of Somalia Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed, which was against the Federal Government, particularly regarding the amendments made to the Provisional Constitution of 2012 and the legal implications arising from it.
The court ruled that the constitutional term of the federal institutions was legally four years.
The judges based their decision on the Provisional Constitution of 2012, and the amendment of 2026 did not explicitly state that the new term would apply to the institutions in power.
The Supreme Court stated that the term of both houses of the Federal Parliament ended on April 14, 2026, while the term of the President of the Republic ended on May 15, 2026.
The actions taken by those institutions after their term expired were described by the court as unconstitutional and unlawful, and thus non-existent. The caretaker government was limited to daily operations.
The court has ordered the political parties to reach an agreement on the electoral process, setting a specific timeframe for holding elections.
The electoral side of the court has ordered that the parties involved reach an agreement on an agreed electoral process within 30 days, and the election should be held within 90 days.
This decision is expected to have a significant impact on the political situation and the debate regarding the legitimacy of Somalia's government institutions.
On the other hand, the Supreme Court of Somalia has described the removal of the Chief Justice, Baashe Yuusuf Axmed, as null and void, stating that the President's decision is not in accordance with the Constitution.
Context and open questions
Reader briefing
Article context
What happened
- The Supreme Court of Somalia ruled that the constitutional term limits for the Federal Parliament, the President, and the Federal Government end in 2026, declaring actions taken after these limits expired as unconstitutional.
Key claims
- The Supreme Court of Somalia ruled that the constitutional term limits for the Federal Parliament, the President, and the Federal Government end in 2026.
- The Supreme Court stated that actions taken by these institutions after their term limits expired were unconstitutional.
- The Supreme Court ordered political parties to reach an agreement on the electoral process within 30 days.
- The Supreme Court described the dismissal of the Chief Justice, Baashe Yuusuf Axmed, as unconstitutional.
Source limitations
- The article does not provide independent verification of the court's claims.
- The article lacks responses from the Federal Government regarding the court's ruling.
- The article does not clarify the implications of the ruling on the current political situation.
Reader takeaway
The Supreme Court's ruling may lead to changes in the political structure and electoral processes in Somalia.
What remains unclear
- What specific actions taken by the government are considered unconstitutional?
- How will the political parties respond to the Supreme Court's order?
- What are the potential consequences of this ruling on the upcoming elections?
Why it matters
The article highlights a significant judicial ruling that could impact the political landscape and governance in Somalia.
Follow Warkasta on WhatsApp
Follow our channel for the latest news.
Follow the channel →Why this story appears
This is a single source report from Warkasta’s monitored network. The source link remains available so you can read the publisher’s original context.
- Source count
- 1
- Sources used
- BBC Somali
- Language mix
- Soomaali
- Translation status
- Stored translation available for this language
- AI synthesis
- No AI synthesis is used for this story panel
Signals used: world · general · sare · xileedka · maxkamadda