Somalia president term extension 'unlawful': Supreme Court
What happened
50-second readThe Supreme Court of Somalia ruled that the extension of the president's term by one year was unlawful, leading to political tensions.
What else the report says
- Decision reportedThe president argued this was legal under amendments to the constitution passed by parliament in March, but that vote was boycotted by opposition parties and regional leaders.
- President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud has tried to move Somalia towards fully democratic elections, replacing the clan-based system in which elders pick their representatives.
- Mohamud's term ended in May, but his government declared a "transition period" that gave him an extra year in office to prepare for the first nationwide democratic elections, which are due in April and May 2027.
- On Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled that the amendments did not apply to his current term and that he should have left office in May.
Reported by Hiiraan Online
- Why it matters
- The article highlights a significant legal ruling that could impact the political landscape in Somalia, particularly regarding the upcoming elections.
- Still unclear
- What will be the political implications of the Supreme Court's ruling?

More from this report
Key points
- The Supreme Court of Somalia ruled that the extension of the president's term by one year was unlawful.
- President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud's term ended in May, but he declared a transition period giving him an extra year.
- The Supreme Court stated that the constitutional amendments passed by parliament did not apply to the president's current term.
Original report with a saved translation · English
English · Machine translated · Not human reviewed
Original source text
Somalia's Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the extension of the president's term by one year, which sparked violent clashes with the opposition, was "unlawful".
President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud has tried to move Somalia towards fully democratic elections, replacing the clan-based system in which elders pick their representatives.
Mohamud's term ended in May, but his government declared a "transition period" that gave him an extra year in office to prepare for the first nationwide democratic elections, which are due in April and May 2027.
The president argued this was legal under amendments to the constitution passed by parliament in March, but that vote was boycotted by opposition parties and regional leaders.
On Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled that the amendments did not apply to his current term and that he should have left office in May.
Mohamud announced late Wednesday that he was dismissing the chief justice, Bashe Yusuf Ahmed, and appointing a replacement.
There were unconfirmed reports that Ahmed was under arrest on Thursday.
The court rejected the dismissal in a separate statement, saying the move was designed "to obstruct the administration of justice in the constitutional case filed before the Supreme Court".
"The dismissal announced in the statement published on the Presidency's Facebook page is null and void," it added.
The constitutional changes sparked uproar in the deeply fragmented country.
The flare-up comes at a time when Somalia is also facing a security crisis related to the long-running insurgency by the Al-Shabaab Islamist group.
International donors, frustrated by the lack of progress against the militants and the endless political chaos, have been slashing funding for the international military mission.
Context and open questions
Reader briefing
Article context
What happened
- The Supreme Court of Somalia ruled that the extension of the president's term by one year was unlawful, leading to political tensions.
Key claims
- The Supreme Court of Somalia ruled that the extension of the president's term by one year was unlawful.
- President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud's term ended in May, but he declared a transition period giving him an extra year.
- The Supreme Court stated that the constitutional amendments passed by parliament did not apply to the president's current term.
- The Supreme Court rejected the president's dismissal of the chief justice, stating it was designed to obstruct justice.
Source limitations
- The article does not provide independent verification of the claims made.
- There are unconfirmed reports regarding the arrest of the chief justice.
- The article lacks responses from the president or his government regarding the court's ruling.
Reader takeaway
The Supreme Court's ruling against the president's term extension raises critical questions about governance and legality in Somalia.
What remains unclear
- What will be the political implications of the Supreme Court's ruling?
- How will the government respond to the court's decision?
- What are the next steps for the upcoming elections in light of this ruling?
Why it matters
The article highlights a significant legal ruling that could impact the political landscape in Somalia, particularly regarding the upcoming elections.
Follow Warkasta on WhatsApp
Follow our channel for the latest news.
Follow the channel →Why this story appears
This is a single source report from Warkasta’s monitored network. The source link remains available so you can read the publisher’s original context.
- Source count
- 1
- Sources used
- Hiiraan Online
- Language mix
- English
- Translation status
- Shown in its original language
- AI synthesis
- No AI synthesis is used for this story panel
Signals used: somalia · politics · politics · court · extension
Keep reading
Live story thread
Open live story