Ethiopia accuses Hassan Sheikh of 'betrayal' after El Alamein meeting
What happened
70-second readThe Ethiopian government has strongly reacted to Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud's stance regarding a statement from a recent summit involving Somalia, Egypt, Eritrea, and Sudan, which addressed tensions over the Nile River.
What else the report says
- The leaders of the four countries emphasized the importance of respecting international law governing transboundary rivers, including the Nile River, particularly the principle of not causing harm, and the obligation of cooperation through prior notification, consultation, and agreement; while fully rejecting any unilateral actions that negatively affect the current water usage of the two countries located in the lower part of the Nile River.
- The Ethiopian News Agency, in a report, accused Hassan Sheikh of supporting actions that it claimed undermine Ethiopia's strategic interests, particularly those related to the use of Nile River water and Red Sea security issues.
- The report, titled “The Deceptions of President Hassan Sheikh are Detrimental to the Realities of the Region,” argued that President Hassan Sheikh is indirectly supporting a political stance that limits Ethiopia's role in the region.
- On the other hand, Ethiopia has mentioned the long-standing relationship with Somalia, highlighting its significant role in Somalia's reconciliation efforts and the support that Ethiopian forces provide to Somalia, particularly in the fight against Al-Shabaab.
Reported by Caasimada Online
- Still unclear
- What specific actions did President Hassan Sheikh take that Ethiopia claims undermine its interests?
You are reading the English translation.

More from this report
Original report with a saved translation · Soomaali
Soomaali · Machine translated · Not human reviewed
Reader translation: English
Addis Ababa (Caasimada Online) – The Ethiopian government has strongly reacted to the position of the President of Somalia, Mr. Hassan Sheikh Mohamud regarding the statement issued from the meeting held by Somalia, Egypt, Eritrea, and Sudan on October 4 in the city of Al-Calamayn in Egypt, which addressed the tensions surrounding the Nile River.
The leaders of the four countries emphasized the importance of respecting international law governing transboundary rivers, including the Nile River, particularly the principle of not causing harm, and the obligation of cooperation through prior notification, consultation, and agreement; while fully rejecting any unilateral actions that negatively affect the current water usage of the two countries located in the lower part of the Nile River.
The Ethiopian News Agency, in a report, accused Hassan Sheikh of supporting actions that it claimed undermine Ethiopia's strategic interests, particularly those related to the use of Nile River water and Red Sea security issues.
The report, titled “The Deceptions of President Hassan Sheikh are Detrimental to the Realities of the Region,” argued that President Hassan Sheikh is indirectly supporting a political stance that limits Ethiopia's role in the region.
On the other hand, Ethiopia has mentioned the long-standing relationship with Somalia, highlighting its significant role in Somalia's reconciliation efforts and the support that Ethiopian forces provide to Somalia, particularly in the fight against Al-Shabaab.
The report also stated that the support President Hassan Sheikh showed in the Al-Calamayn statement could lead to a reevaluation of the security and cooperation relationship between Somalia and Ethiopia that has existed for many years.
On the other hand, the Ethiopian report criticized the President of Eritrea, Isaias Afwerki, with the author arguing that Eritrea's role in the Al-Calamayn conference appeared to lean towards the interests of Egypt, particularly regarding issues related to the Nile waters.
However, Ethiopia has long had disputes with Egypt and Sudan over the management and use of the Nile waters, with the main contention being Ethiopia's Grand Renaissance Dam, which Egypt and Sudan have expressed concerns about its impact.
It is also noted that Ethiopia, which does not have a coastline, has recently shown a significant need for a maritime trade route, an issue that has become part of Addis Ababa's foreign policy and its relations with neighboring countries.
Context and open questions
Reader briefing
Article context
What happened
- The Ethiopian government has strongly reacted to Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud's stance regarding a statement from a recent summit involving Somalia, Egypt, Eritrea, and Sudan, which addressed tensions over the Nile River.
Key claims
- The Ethiopian government has accused Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud of supporting actions that undermine Ethiopia's strategic interests regarding the Nile River.
- Ethiopia's report claims that Hassan Sheikh's support for the Al-Alamein statement could lead to a reevaluation of security and cooperation relations between Somalia and Ethiopia.
- Ethiopia has long been in conflict with Egypt and Sudan over the management and use of the Nile waters.
Source limitations
- The article primarily reflects the Ethiopian government's perspective without including responses from the Somali government.
- Claims made by the Ethiopian government regarding President Hassan Sheikh's actions are not independently verified.
- The article does not provide details on the specific outcomes of the summit.
Reader takeaway
The Ethiopian government's accusations against President Hassan Sheikh highlight ongoing tensions regarding the Nile River and regional diplomacy.
What remains unclear
- What specific actions did President Hassan Sheikh take that Ethiopia claims undermine its interests?
- How will this accusation affect the diplomatic relations between Somalia and Ethiopia?
- What are the implications of the Nile River tensions for regional stability?
Why it matters
The article does not provide enough independently verified detail to assess the specific significance of this event beyond what is reported.
Follow Warkasta on WhatsApp
Follow our channel for the latest news.
Follow the channel →Why this story appears
This is a single source report from Warkasta’s monitored network. The source link remains available so you can read the publisher’s original context.
- Source count
- 1
- Sources used
- Caasimada Online
- Language mix
- Soomaali
- Translation status
- Stored translation available for this language
- AI synthesis
- No AI synthesis is used for this story panel
Signals used: somalia · general · itoobiya · xasan · shirkii
Keep reading
Live story thread
Open live story